Home | Members of the Firm | How to Contact Us bc-law .com
Benezra & Culver L.L.C.
 Last Modified:  

 

 

 

This Web site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the law firm is not engaged in rendering legal advice. If legal advice is required, the services of a competent professional in your state should be sought.

 



COLORADO SUPREME COURT REJECTS "PRETEXT-PLUS" TO PROVE INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION

 

The law firm of Benezra & Culver, L.L.C. successfully represented the State Personnel Board in an important decision by the Colorado Supreme Court entitled Bodaghi v. Colorado Department of Natural Resources, which was decided on March 13, 2000. Gilbert M. Roman argued the case on behalf of the State Personnel Board.

The case involved an employee of Iranian descent, Ahmad Bodaghi, who had been promoted four times, and named Land Board "Employee of the Year" with the Department of Natural Resources. However, when Bodaghi’s position was upgraded, Bodaghi was told that he was qualified to work the position at the lower level but not as qualified to work the position at the upgraded level.

Bodaghi filed a claim of national origin discrimination and after an evidentiary hearing, the Administrative Law Judge determined that there was sufficient evidence of intentional discrimination. The ALJ found that the successful non-Iranian employee did not have the required experience for the position, and that the reasons given for selecting the other employee over Mr. Bodaghi were pretextual. The Personnel Board adopted the ALJ’s findings and ordered that Mr. Bodaghi be appointed to the upgraded position.

On two separate occasions, the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed the Personnel Board’s finding that there was insufficient evidence of intentional. As the issue went before the Colorado Supreme Court, the law firm of Benezra & Culver, L.L.C. was contacted and asked to represent the State Personnel Board. On March 13, 2000, the Colorado Supreme Court rejected the Court of Appeals’ findings that Ahmad Bodaghi had failed to establish sufficient evidence of intentional discrimination.

Importantly, the Colorado Supreme Court stated:

We wish to make patently clear that in Colorado ‘[w]here a prima facie case of discrimination is proven and the reasons given [by the employer as a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason] are found to be a pretext for that discrimination, no additional evidence is required to infer intentional discrimination.

 

Top